Annex 3 - Vulnerability to Damage by International Shipping Activities
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Resolutions - Marine Environment Protection Committee - Resolution MEPC.283(70) – Designation of the Jomard Entrance as a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area – (Adopted on 28 October 2016) - Annex 3 - Vulnerability to Damage by International Shipping Activities

Annex 3 - Vulnerability to Damage by International Shipping Activities

 1 VESSEL TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS

Operational factors

1.1 Fishing vessels, local trade vessels, local sailing canoes, tourist and recreational craft can be encountered anywhere in the Jomard Entrance area.

1.2 There are currently no existing activities or foreseeable developments of offshore exploration or exploitation of the seabed. Nautilus Mining previously held Exploration Licence Tenements in the Solomon Sea, however these lapsed. Similarly, there are no offshore structures other than those used to provide aids to navigation in the region.

Vessel types

1.3 There is a wide variety of vessels operating in this area, including large bulk carriers, timber carriers, LNG, oil and chemical tankers, passenger ships, cruise liners and third generation container ships.

1.4 Since July 2014, LNG has become one of the primary commodities exported by PNG. It is predicted that around 110 LNG ships will call at PNG ports each year for the first three years, with this number forecast to double by 2020. All LNG ships will use Jomard Entrance as their primary route to/from Japan, which is contracted to import around 85% of PNG's LNG. There is a second LNG project within PNG that will likely be developed in the near future.

1.5 Papua New Guinea (PNG) is experiencing significant growth in marine tourism. Cruise industry sources reveal that up to 100 ship calls per annum are expected each year for the next five years, following which a further growth of 34% is estimated for the next five years.

Traffic characteristics

1.6 PNG is experiencing a marked increase in the volume of international ship traffic passing through its waters. It is estimated that some 9,200 ships transited its waters in 2013. Many ships in ballast drift near the southern approaches to Jomard Entrance awaiting their turn to load at Australian ports. Some 90% of the ships carrying commodities exported by Australia's eastern coast ports to north Asian markets (including China, Japan and the Republic of Korea) use this most direct route through PNG's waters.

1.7 Over the last decade and a half, commodity exports have been a key driver of economic activity in Australia, driven by strong growth in demand from emerging economies in Asia. Substantial resource exports (mainly coal and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)) from Australian ports have contributed to increased traffic through PNG's waters. This trend is predicted to continue for some time to come.

1.8 Coal exports from the state of Queensland in Australia will be the biggest driver of increased shipping through Jomard Entrance, through which northbound ships loaded with coal from the ports of Hay Point, Abbot Point and Gladstone will traverse. The coal port of Newcastle on the central coast of New South Wales also contributes to the significant traffic through Jomard Entrance.

1.9 As an example, the number of ships calling at the Australian coal exporting port of Abbot Point each year is forecast to grow from 172 (in 2012) to 1,640 (in 2032) – almost a tenfold increase. Likewise, annual traffic from Hay Point in central Queensland is forecast to grow from 809 ships to 2,380 ships in the same period.

1.10 Concurrently, strong growth in PNG's mining and resource sectors has led to it becoming one of the world's fastest growing economies. As noted above, a variety of ship types transit PNG's pristine and reef-littered waters, the majority along well-used routes, see figure 1.

Figure 1 – Shipping traffic patterns in and around PNG waters

1.11 Taking into account the current and project levels of international shipping traffic, a risk assessment conducted using the IALA Waterways Risk Assessment Program Mk2 in February 2013 found that the introduction of a two-way route could reduce the frequency of potential collisions from the one every seven years to one every 14 years – a reduction of 50% in the number of potential collisions.

Harmful substances carried

1.12 Vessels transiting Jomard Entrance are primarily bulk carriers, however there are also significant numbers of oil, chemical/products and LNG tankers.

2 NATURAL FACTORS

Hydrographical

2.1 Hydrographic surveys in the immediate area of the Two-way routes are to Zone of Confidence (ZOC) B. These surveys confirm existing charted depths and depiction of reef edges and are to be incorporated in a new 1:75,000 large scale chart in 2014 – 15. Areas outside the limits of these surveys are to ZOC C. Notably, the reefs defining Jomard Entrance are fronted by deep water which considerably exceeds the maximum draught of any surface vessel which could conceivably use the route.

2.2 It is worth noting that through extensive use by commercial shipping over an extended period of time, bathymetric surveys in the region of the Two-way route have been proven as adequate for safe navigation.

2.3 Electronic Navigation Chart (ENC) coverage of the area is provided as ENC AU412152, Edition 2, at a nominal scale of 1:90,000. This was updated to include larger scale coverage to the limits shown in Chartlet 1 (see annex 4) prior to the establishment of the Two-way route. Smaller scale approach coverage of the Coral and Solomon Seas is provided by AU220150 Edition 3. Additionally, smaller scale ENC are also available for planning. All ENC are metric and referenced to WGS84 and Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT).

2.4 Paper chart coverage of Jomard Entrance is available in a new chart at a scale of 1:75,000 with limits and extent as shown in Chartlet 1 in annex 4. The entrance is also depicted on existing smaller scale charts, ranging from 1:150,000 for navigation and at smaller scales for planning. All charts are metric and referenced to WGS84 and LAT.

Meteorological

2.5 The Jomard Passage is in a tropical cyclone prone zone. Though cyclone frequency is expected to decrease with climate change projections, the severity is expected to increase when they do occur. The main shipping routes are heavily exposed to prevailing south-east trade winds, which have a fetch of hundreds of nautical miles.

Oceanographic

2.6 Previous research has shown evidence of surface and deep boundary currents flowing around the southern end of the Louisiade Archipelago, with leakage of surface water from the Coral Sea through the Louisiade Archipelago.

3 OTHER INFORMATION

History of groundings, collisions or spills

Groundings

3.1 Chart Aus 510 shows four wrecks (visible at chart datum) on the immediate reefs in and around Jomard Entrance. In the early 2000s, several longliners ran aground in the Jomard and Bramble Haven area, with three running aground in 2000. In 2006, a bulk carrier grounded on Long Reef near Jomard Entrance, spilling oil and raw sugar. In 2011, the total loss of engine power by a container ship in the same area led to the Royal Australian Navy providing assistance by way of a patrol boat (which happened to be on exercise in PNG at the time). A tow line attached to the stricken ship prevented it from grounding on nearby reefs and potentially causing reef damage and pollution of the area.

Marine Debris

3.2 A marine debris survey conducted in 2012 on four islands within the PSSA – Jomard, Panarairai, Punawan and Siva – reported that marine debris is accumulating in significant amounts on these islands (Raaymakers et al., 2012). While further work would be needed to establish with any certainty the proportion of debris contributed by shipping, it is hoped that the revised MARPOL Annex V, which entered into force on 1 January 2013, will result in a reduction in marine debris from shipping within the PSSA.

Intervention and response

3.3 The length and remoteness of PNG's coastline poses major challenges to any response to an accident and containing any resulting pollution. These challenges are also compounded due to limited response capabilities in the region. As noted above, the main shipping routes are heavily exposed to prevailing south-east trade winds. A casualty in such circumstances will make any salvage and recovery task challenging. The closest tugs and oil spill response equipment are located at Port Moresby, which is approximately 330 nautical miles away. Therefore, it is vital to avoid incidents in the region.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.