Section
2 Minimum structural requirements
2.1 General
2.1.1 The
requirements of this Section, unless specified otherwise, are applicable
to all ship types, NS1, NS2 and NS3.
2.1.3 In addition,
where plating contributes to the global strength of the ship, the
thickness is to be not less than that required to satisfy the global
strength requirements detailed in Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 4 Hull Girder Strength
2.2 Corrosion margin
2.2.1 The minimum thicknesses given in Table 3.2.1 Minimum structural
requirements are based on the assumption that the correct
coatings are used and a proper maintenance regime is employed such that there is
negligible loss in strength due to corrosion. Where this is not the case the minimum
thickness will be specially considered. For corrosion margins, see
Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 6, 3.8 Corrosion margin
Table 3.2.1 Minimum structural
requirements
Item
|
Minimum Scantling
|
Shell envelope
|
|
Bottom
shell and bilge plating
|
|
≥ 5,0ω mm
|
|
|
Side shell
plating
|
|
≥ 4,0ω mm
|
|
|
Breadth of
keel plate, if fitted
|
|
≥ 750 mm
|
See Note 1
|
|
Keel plate
thickness, if fitted
|
|
|
See Note 2
|
|
Breadth of
stem plate
|
|
≥ 600 mm
|
|
|
Stem plate
thickness
|
|
|
See Note 2
|
|
Bar keel
area, if fitted
|
cm2
|
|
|
|
Bar keel
thickness, if fitted
|
|
|
See Note 2
|
Single
bottom structure
|
|
Centre
girder web thickness
|
|
≥ 4,0ω mm
|
|
|
Side girder
web thickness
|
|
≥ 3,5ω mm
|
|
|
Floor web
thickness
|
|
≥ 3,5ω
mm
|
|
|
Centreline
girder face flat area
|
|
|
|
|
Floor face
flat area
|
|
|
See Note 3
|
|
Depth of
floors, df
|
|
|
|
Double bottom structure
|
|
Inner
bottom plating thickness
|
|
≥ 4,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Centreline
girder web thickness
|
|
≥ 4,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Side
girder web thickness
|
|
≥ 3,5ω
mm
|
|
|
Floor web
thickness
|
|
≥ 3,5ω
mm
|
|
|
Depth of
double bottom, dDB
|
|
≥ 630
mm
|
|
Watertight bulkheads
|
|
Plating
thickness
|
|
≥ 3,5ω mm
|
|
Deep tank bulkheads
|
|
Plating
thickness
|
|
≥ 4,0ω
mm
|
|
Deck structure
|
|
Strength
deck
|
|
≥ 4,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Internal
and lower decks
|
|
≥ 3,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Exposed
deck plating thickness, fwd of 0,75L
R
|
|
≥ 5,0ω mm
|
|
|
Exposed
deck plating thickness, aft of 0,75LR
|
|
≥ 4,0ω mm
|
|
Superstructure and deckhouses
|
|
Deck
plating thickness
|
|
≥ 3,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Side
plating thickness
|
|
≥ 3,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Front
plating thickness, fwd of 0,75LR
|
|
≥ 5,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Front
plating thickness, aft of 0,75LR
|
|
≥ 4,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Back
plating thickness
|
|
≥ 3,0ω
mm
|
|
|
Machinery
casing plating thickness
|
|
≥ 3,0ω
mm
|
|
Pillars
|
|
Wall
thickness of tubular pillars
|
|
≥ 2,5ω
mm
|
|
|
Wall
thickness of rectangular pillars
|
|
≥ 2,5ω
mm
|
|
Plated mast structures which are not
structurally effective
|
|
Deck, side and back plating
|
3mm
|
|
|
Front
plating thickness, fwd of 0,75LR
|
5mm
|
|
|
Front
plating thickness, aft of 0,75LR
|
4mm
|
|
Symbols
|
L1
|
= |
LR but need not be taken greater than 190m |
|
L
2
|
= |
LR but need not be taken greater than 215m |
|
|
|
σo
|
= |
specified minimum yield strength of the material, in
N/mm2
|
|
σu
|
= |
specified minimum ultimate tensile strength of the
material, in N/mm2
|
|
bp
|
= |
minimum breadth of cross section of hollow
rectangular pillar, in mm |
|
dp
|
= |
outside diameter of tubular pillar, in mm |
|
|
Note
1. Maximum keel breadth 1800 mm.
|
Note
2. Not to be less than adjacent shell
plate. Above the design waterline the bar keel may be the same as the
adjacent shell.
|
Note
3. Face plate thickness not to be less
than floor thickness.
|
Table 3.2.2 Vessel type correction factor
(ω)
Vessel type
|
ω
|
Bottom structure of ships operating
aground
|
1,2
|
NS1
|
1,1
|
NS2 and NS3
|
1,0
|
2.3 Impact consideration
2.3.1 Due
consideration is to be given to the scantlings of all structures which
may be subject to local impact loadings. For example decks in workshops.
Impact testing may be required to be carried out at the discretion
of LR to demonstrate the suitability of the proposed scantlings for
a particular application.
2.4 Sheathing
2.4.1 Areas
of shell and deck which are subject to additional wear by abrasion
from, i.e. removal or stores routes, working areas, forefoot region,
etc. are to be suitably protected by local reinforcement or sheathing.
This sheathing may be of timber, rubber, steel, additional layers
of reinforcement, etc. as appropriate. Details of such sheathing and
the method of attachment are to be submitted for consideration.
2.4.2 The
attachment of sheathing by mechanical means such as bolting or other
methods is not to impair the watertight integrity of the ship. Through
bolting of the hull is to be kept to a minimum and avoided where practicable.
The design arrangements in way of any through bolting are to be such
that damage to the sheathing will not impair the watertight integrity
of the hull.
2.4.3 When
decks that are not structurally effective or subject to significant
inplane stresses are fitted with approved sheathing, the thickness
derived may be reduced by 10 per cent for a 50 mm sheathing thickness,
or five per cent for 25 mm, with intermediate values in proportion.
The steel deck is to be coated with a suitable material in order to
prevent corrosive action, and the sheathing or composition is to be
effectively secured to the deck. Inside deckhouses the thickness may
be reduced by a further 10 per cent.
2.5 Special considerations
2.5.1 Flight
decks and structures in way of launcher ramps, gun platforms, etc.
will be subject to special consideration.
2.5.2 The
minimum plating thickness of ships intended for operation in ice conditions
will be specially considered.
2.5.3 Ships
with shock enhanced notation are not to be fitted with bar keels.
Docking arrangements are to be specially considered.
2.5.4 For
large or novel ships, the scantlings of the stern will be specially
considered.
2.5.5 Where
water jet or sterndrive units are fitted, the scantlings of the plating
in way of the nozzles and connections will be specially considered.
2.6 Direct calculations
2.6.1 The
thickness requirements derived from Table 3.2.1 Minimum structural
requirements may be specially considered, where direct calculation
procedures are adopted to demonstrate the suitability of the proposed
alternative, e.g. shear buckling analysis may be performed on girder
or floor webs.
|